In the vibrant world of contemporary art, few artists resonate with the struggles and triumphs of their journey quite like Jessie Makinson. An artist whose work reflects a deep exploration of figurative painting, Jessie shares her experiences from her formative years in London to her current artistic practice. This blog post delves into her artistic evolution, revealing the lessons learned along the way and the influences that shape her unique style.
A Foundation in Art
Jessie Makinson’s artistic journey began in Camberwell, London, where she pursued her foundation at Camberwell Art College. Her experience there was enriched by the diversity of students from around the globe, igniting her passion for art. Despite her enthusiasm, Jessie’s time at Edinburgh College of Art was challenging. She recalls feeling discouraged from pursuing figurative painting, a style she deeply loved, as the school’s ethos leaned away from traditional forms. This feeling of embarrassment around figurative art was a significant hurdle she had to overcome.
Supportive Learning Environments
After Edinburgh, Jessie’s quest for artistic growth led her to the Royal Drawing School in London. Here, she found a nurturing environment that emphasized observational drawing. Jessie fondly remembers the daily practice of drawing from life, even from subjects she initially found unappealing. This rigorous training helped her refine her artistic vision and develop her unique voice. She describes this period as crucial, stating that it helped her see artistic possibilities in everyday scenes, shaping her perspective as an artist.
The Impact of Turps Banana
Unable to get into a Master’s program, Jessie discovered Terps Banana, an alternative art school founded by Marcus Harvey. This institution was significant in her artistic development, allowing her to experiment freely without the constraints of traditional academic requirements. At Terps, Jessie learned that creating art could be a process of trial and error, emphasizing that making “bad” work was essential to eventual success. This approach allowed her to explore her creativity without fear, leading to the emergence of her distinctive style.
Finding Her Voice
For a long time, Jessie felt lost in her artistic practice, particularly in the realm of figurative painting. The rise of social media platforms like Instagram played a crucial role in connecting her with other artists and communities. One pivotal experience was drawing at the National Gallery with fellow artist Anne Bouker. The energy of this experience and the opportunity to study masterpieces allowed Jessie to develop her understanding of art history, which profoundly influenced her work.
Evolving Artistic Themes
As Jessie’s work evolved, she found herself drawn to themes of folklore, fantasy, and science fiction. However, she recently felt the need to simplify her work, moving away from what she described as the “fairy party” aesthetic. This shift allowed her to focus more on the tension within her figures and the significance of clothing and patterns, leading to a more honest representation of her artistic intentions.
The Creative Process
Jessie’s creative process is meticulous and involves considerable planning and exploration of her subjects. She often begins with quick sketches based on research and historical contexts, melding them into her unique compositions. Unlike traditional painters who build their work gradually, Jessie prefers to finish small sections before moving on, ensuring she has a clear vision of how the painting will look.
The Role of Color and Title
Color plays a pivotal role in Jessie’s work, where she often uses uncomfortable and high-contrast colors to evoke emotions. Recently, she has experimented with different underpainting techniques, transitioning to a clear primed linen that allows her colors to blend more subtly. Additionally, her approach to titling her paintings has changed, opting for more descriptive names that reflect the subject matter directly, such as “The Architects” and “The Players.” This shift signifies her move towards a more straightforward narrative in her art.
Jessie Makinson’s Artistic Journey
Jessie Makinson’s journey as an artist is a testament to resilience and growth. From overcoming the challenges of figurative painting in her education to embracing her unique style, Jessie emphasizes the importance of exploration, community, and self-acceptance in the artistic process. Her story inspires aspiring artists to find their voice, embrace imperfections, and remain open to the evolving nature of their work.
Originally from El Prat, near Barcelona, Cristina BanBan has emerged as one of the most distinctive voices in contemporary painting. Her relationship with art began early and instinctively. Her parents enrolled her in art school at the age of five — a defining gesture.
“I always knew I wanted to do something with drawing and painting,” she recalls.
Since childhood, a sketchbook and pencils have never left her side. This intimate connection to drawing is rooted in a traditional education centered on observing reality. Very early, she learned to copy, to understand light, to master color, watercolor, and acrylics, and eventually to draw from life. This rigorous discipline forged both her vision and her precision.
Between Popular Culture and Pictorial Heritage
Cristina BanBan’s early influences reflect the hybridity of her generation. While Picasso was her first artistic shock — “Picasso was my first influence” — she also acknowledges the profound impact of popular visual culture: Japanese anime series such as Dragon Ball, Sailor Moon, and Doraemon fed her teenage imagination. This dual belonging — between high art and popular culture — still flows through her work today, where the monumentality of the body meets an almost graphic expressiveness.
From Barcelona to London: The Search for Artistic Identity
Graduating in 2010 from the University of Fine Arts of Barcelona, which she describes as “very conservative,” Cristina BanBan decided to move to London, where she lived for seven years.
“I felt very lost, and the way I spent my free time was mostly drawing,” she explains.
There, she developed — almost self-taught — a personal visual language blending sensuality, strength, and humor. From 2016 onwards, painting became her main medium of expression.
The Call of New York: A Defining Turning Point
In 2019, a residency in New York transformed her trajectory. Invited by a gallery, she discovered a new source of energy:
“I had so much fun. It was so exciting, and I felt it brought me back to life.”
The New York experience became foundational — offering her the freedom and experimentation that pushed her practice toward looser, more gestural forms.
While the female body remains central to her work, Cristina BanBan now treats it as a vessel for emotion rather than representation. Around 2022, she began to explore distortion, tension, and fragmentation. She cites Willem de Kooning, Joan Mitchell, Paula Rego, and Lucian Freud among her references, as well as Joaquín Sorolla, whose mastery of light and gesture she deeply admires.
Evolving Style: From the Body to Composition
While the female body remains central to her work, Cristina BanBan now treats it as a vessel for emotion rather than representation. Around 2022, she began to explore distortion, tension, and fragmentation. She cites Willem de Kooning, Joan Mitchell, Paula Rego, and Lucian Freud among her references, as well as Joaquín Sorolla, whose mastery of light and gesture she deeply admires.
Her creative process is grounded in drawing — “Drawing is a very calm, meditative state for me” — but her approach to painting is driven by energy and impulse. Without preparatory sketches, she advances instinctively, “breaking” canvases that fail to work and immediately starting anew.
“Lorquianas”: An Homage to Federico García Lorca
Presented at Galerie Perrotin in Paris, Lorquianas marks a major milestone in BanBan’s career. Inspired by Federico García Lorca, the celebrated Spanish poet and playwright, Cristina BanBan reinterprets his world through a series of powerful and lyrical works.
Invited to work at the Centro Federico García Lorca in Granada, she delved into the poet’s archives, drawings, and photographs. From this dialogue emerged ten large-scale paintings and several drawings intertwining symbols, architecture, and feminine figures. The paintings evoke Lorca’s tragic heroines — Yerma, La Casa de Bernarda Alba — as well as his dreamlike characters: clowns, sailors, Pierrots.
“The meaning of the exhibition is to give life to Lorca’s legacy in a different context here in Paris,” she explains.
The Female Body as a Territory of Emotion
In Lorquianas, Cristina BanBan chose, for the first time, to dress her figures. Clothing becomes a narrative tool, a bearer of symbols. Yet painting the female body remains her central thread:
“As a woman painting women, my gaze is inevitably different.”
Her canvases convey the emotional power of the body — its vulnerability and strength — far removed from any erotic intention. Lorquianas thus stands as a pictorial meditation on femininity, memory, and poetry. Between figuration and abstraction, between Spain and America, Cristina BanBan transforms painting into a sensitive language — a space where the body becomes metaphor and color becomes emotion.
Laurent Proux (born 1980, Versailles) is a French contemporary painter whose work explores the dialogue between industry and nature, human labor and material poetry. Raised in Viroflay and trained at the École des Beaux-Arts de Lyon, Proux creates textured, layered compositions that examine how humanity constructs, consumes, and coexists with its environment. His recent exhibition, “The Nature Poem,” presented at Galerie Semiose in Paris (2024), reflects on the oxymoronic relationship between human creation and the natural world.
From Industrial Roots to Early Themes
Laurent Proux’s family background in industry profoundly shaped his early vision. His father began as a factory worker in Chalon-sur-Saône before becoming a business owner, instilling in him a fascination with production, labor, and material transformation. These early experiences became the foundation of his first artistic investigations.
“My family was quite tied to industry—completely tied, really—because my father started out as a factory worker in Chalon-sur-Saône. Later he had his own company, so he was a boss at the end of his life. I started working around one of the themes that has run through my painting—the working and industrial world.”
Proux’s initial paintings often depicted factories and industrial interiors, stripped of people yet filled with traces of human presence. He sought to reveal “the reverse side of the set, the backstage of how things are made,” a realm “much less clean, much less sparkling” than the polished surface of consumer goods. For him, the factory is a place where matter precedes commodity—a space for honoring those who make, build, and transform.
Through these early explorations, Laurent Proux established his core artistic vocabulary: a fascination with the unseen, the process of fabrication, and the material truth behind appearances. His paintings are physical, textured, and layered, emphasizing the act of painting as a gesture of work, echoing the manual labor they often depict.
The Reversal: Nude Bodies and Natural Spaces
As his artistic journey evolved, Proux experienced a decisive shift in subject matter—a “reversal,” as he calls it—moving from depictions of factories to representations of nude bodies immersed in natural landscapes. This transition emerged from a desire to paint what his industrial subjects had excluded: the body and nature.
“I said to myself: it’s the bodies. Nude bodies are bodies that, a priori, carry no social signs. And if the factory is a mechanical jungle, a jungle of wires, cables, steel, and plastic, what I’m not representing is nature—the pastoral universe, the forest.”
This shift did not signify a rupture but a continuation—an exploration of what lies at the other pole of human existence. The earlier mechanical spaces gave way to Edenic, dreamlike environments, where figures exist beyond social codes, surrounded by organic elements and diffuse light.
By moving from the industrial to the natural, Laurent Proux opened a new field of tension between civilization and instinct, technology and sensuality. His nature scenes retain a structural discipline reminiscent of machinery, yet they pulse with freedom, color, and movement.
Training and Artistic Influences
A graduate of the Beaux-Arts de Lyon, Proux developed his early subjects centered on the working class and realism. His goal was to reveal the hidden aspects of reality—the unseen labor and raw materials that precede the finished product.
Before entering art school, his brother Xavier Proux introduced him to literature and visual culture. Paperback covers often illustrated by paintings were his first contact with art. Among his formative influences, Gustave Moreau holds a special place. A visit to the Musée Gustave Moreau in Paris with his brother was, in his words, a revelation.
“I was completely entranced by his colors, his strange studio, and those half-collapsed paintings with almost formless bodies.”
Later, during a year at the Beaux-Arts de Paris, Proux discovered Giorgio de Chirico through his professor Alain Bonfand, who introduced him to the metaphysical dimension of painting. The sense of expectation and stillness in De Chirico’s works, particularly The Enigma of Time, profoundly marked him.
“I remember those images of De Chirico—the Enigma of Time—the reproductions of his paintings, that slightly metaphysical atmosphere, the waiting they create; they truly struck me.”
For Proux, De Chirico’s work embodies the tension between monumentality and fragility. He describes its illumination as “a faint theatrical light.” In his own practice, light becomes a director, an architect, and a choreographer, revealing rather than fixing the forms on canvas.
Light, Material, and the Lessons of Spain
Proux’s residency at the Casa de Velázquez in Madrid deepened his engagement with light. The dramatic and apocalyptic luminosity of Spanish Baroque painting—seen in artists like Ribera and Zurbarán—inspired him to use light as a narrative force. He sought to create moments where light unsettles rather than comforts, where it reveals the instability of forms and evokes spiritual transformation.
He also cites the influence of Dominique Figarella, an abstract painter and teacher at the Beaux-Arts de Paris. Figarella’s method—constructing paintings as assemblages of materials endowed with meaning—resonated with Proux’s interest in the “semiology of materials.”
“He often spoke of materials as crucibles. Like in industry—a crucible is something that holds history, something through which meaning passes.”
Another mentor, Yves Bélorgey, known for his paintings of rationalist architecture, encouraged Proux to analyze the texture and semiotic language of materials. Bélorgey’s exploration of modern urban construction echoed Proux’s fascination with the tangible and the structural.
A Turning Point: Chicago and the Human Figure
A pivotal trip to Chicago in 2019 introduced Proux to major African-American artists such as Kerry James Marshall, Jacob Lawrence, and Aaron Douglas, whose work grounded representation in social and historical context. This exposure led to a breakthrough moment of imagination: he envisioned three bodies on a couch before a tree, a scene that became his painting Intérieur South Side—a cornerstone in his rediscovery of the human form.
Laurent Proux also acknowledges Albrecht Altdorfer for his use of deformation and cosmic scope, and Gustave Courbet for his commitment to social realism and the portrayal of desire. Both remain enduring references in his practice.
“For me, Courbet is… it’s complex to explain because he’s many things. There’s the social dimension of his art that interests me—the art of the people—and, at the same time, his fascination with desire.”
The Fabrication of Reality in Painting
Proux conceives painting as a construction of reality, not its imitation. In his early works, photography served as documentation—a way to study texture, form, and process. His goal was never to reproduce the appearance of things but to find their pictorial equivalent.
“That is, not to reproduce the appearance of something but to find the gesture equivalent to that thing in painting—a pictorial gesture that expresses what the thing is, even when it is not representational.”
For example, in depicting chipboard, Proux does not paint each fragment. Instead, he applies brushstrokes that, by their rhythm, embody the energy of the material. Similarly, a blade of grass is conveyed not by shape but by movement—“the energy of the grass itself.”
In recent years, he has integrated collage techniques, assembling paper cutouts to form composite figures and scenes. These figures, often with distorted anatomies, suggest emotion rather than accuracy—sentimental or erotic architectures of the body.
“The Nature Poem”: Between Creation and the Natural World
The title of his 2024 exhibition, “The Nature Poem,” borrowed from a poem by Richard Brautigan, encapsulates Proux’s philosophical vision. The expression is an oxymoron: poem (from the Greek poema, meaning creation or fabrication) contrasts with nature, which exists independently of human intervention.
“It’s a perfect oxymoron, since poem, poema in ancient Greek, means fabrication, creation—poiesis—whereas nature is everything that exists without us, everything that doesn’t need to be made.”
The exhibition’s central painting, also titled The Nature Poem, is a large-format canvas that plays with unreal light, rich textures, and painterly gesture. Moss on a tree trunk transforms into “fish scales” or “bubble wrap,” turning the tree into “something animal.” Figures gather around a central void—a symbolic cave of mystery, embodying the unknown within nature.
The exhibition unfolds as a journey from twilight to revelation, moving from dusky, introspective scenes to lighter, more open compositions. In To the Night, figures inhabit a semi-aquatic landscape bathed in blue twilight, while the final painting portrays a serene Garden of Eden, complete with a small factory on the horizon—a reminder of humanity’s dual role as creator and destroyer.
Industry, Proux suggests, “is what allows us to inhabit nature—and what destroys it at the same time.”
Creation as Necessity
For Laurent Proux, art-making is inseparable from introspection—and from boredom.
“I think making art means accepting boredom. If you never get bored, there is no art.”
He sees boredom as the fertile ground where imagination takes root, away from distraction. The act of painting carries an emotional duality: the impatient desire to complete a work and the quiet melancholy that follows its completion.
Through this rhythm of construction, tension, and release, Laurent Proux redefines painting as both a physical craft and philosophical inquiry—a way of understanding the world through making. His art invites us to reflect on the processes of fabrication, the fragile coexistence of humanity and nature, and the enduring power of desire in artistic creation.
Bennett Miller, the Academy Award-nominated director behind Capote, Moneyball, and Foxcatcher, has always pushed the boundaries of cinematic storytelling. In this exclusive interview, he delves into the intersection of art, technology, and artificial intelligence, drawing fascinating parallels between the creative process in filmmaking and the advancements in AI-driven image generation, such as OpenAI’s DALL·E.
Bennett Miller’s Cinematic Vision
Miller has built a reputation for directing films that combine meticulous research, immersive storytelling, and profound character studies. His films have been critically acclaimed, earning multiple Academy Award nominations and redefining how true stories can be adapted for the screen. Throughout his career, he has explored the complexities of human ambition, deception, and the structures that shape creative expression.
The Intersection of AI and Filmmaking
One of the central topics in this interview is Miller’s perspective on the growing role of AI in creative fields. He reflects on how AI tools like DALL·E, which generate images from text descriptions, mirror aspects of the filmmaking process. Much like a director guiding a film crew, AI responds to prompts and iterates on ideas, leading to unexpected and sometimes profound results.
Miller discusses how AI is shifting the landscape of artistic creation, raising questions about authorship, originality, and the role of the human artist in an age where machines can produce visually compelling works.
The Evolution of Creativity in the Digital Age
Despite concerns over automation and the role of AI in art, Miller sees these technological advances as a continuation of artistic evolution. He compares it to historical shifts in art and cinema—just as photography transformed painting and digital technology reshaped filmmaking, AI presents both challenges and new possibilities.
He emphasizes that AI should be seen as a tool for artists rather than a replacement, allowing for new forms of storytelling and artistic experimentation.
A Philosophical Perspective on AI and Human Creativity
Throughout the conversation, Miller takes a thoughtful, almost philosophical approach to AI and its implications for cinema, art, and the human imagination. He highlights the need for artists to engage with these tools, understanding their potential while also questioning their limitations.
As AI-generated imagery becomes more sophisticated, Miller suggests that the role of the artist remains essential, even in an age of machine-generated content.
The Future of AI and Art
Bennett Miller’s insights provide a compelling glimpse into the future of art and technology. While AI continues to evolve, the human capacity for storytelling, interpretation, and emotional depth remains irreplaceable.
As filmmakers and artists navigate this new landscape, Miller’s perspective serves as a reflection on what it means to be creative in an era of technological transformation.
Renowned British painter Glenn Brown has redefined the boundaries of contemporary art by merging Surrealism, Photorealism, and historical references into a unique visual language. Born in 1966 in a small mining village in northern England, Brown grew up surrounded by literature and music rather than visual arts. His work is celebrated for its meticulous detail, complex appropriations, and evocative distortions that invite viewers to question the meaning of art and originality.
The Early Foundations of Creativity
Brown’s formative years were marked by a love of books and music, fostered by his parents in rural Norfolk. He recalls his unexpected introduction to visual art through pop music:
“My first introduction to Henri Fantin-Latour’s paintings was by an album cover designed by Peter Saville for New Order.”
Programs from the Open University further expanded his education in art and film, giving him a rich cultural foundation before he ever set foot in an art college.
At art school, Brown’s education varied from academic life drawing to modernist theories of color and abstraction. He was influenced by the German and American art movements of the 1980s, including Gerhard Richter and Sigmar Polke, both of whom shaped his approach to the “death of painting.” As Brown explains:
“You build upon tradition, you play with it, and you break it whenever you want to.”
Painting in a Mediated World
Brown’s career has been deeply influenced by the concept of appropriation, drawing inspiration from artists like Sherrie Levine and Salvador Dalí. He reflects on the process of reinterpreting images:
“I loved Sherrie Levine’s photographs… where you become dizzy because you don’t know what to look at.”
This fascination led to his unique practice of creating “paintings of paintings,” using mediated images as his subject. His work bridges the gap between Photorealism and Surrealism, as seen in his pieces based on Dalí and science fiction illustrator Chris Foss. Brown notes:
“The idea of making photorealist paintings of photorealist paintings… seemed so mind-numbingly boring that I couldn’t bear to do it.”
Instead, he introduces distortions and layers that amplify fantasy and escapism.
A Dialogue Between Paintings – In the Altogether
For his exhibition In the Altogether, presented at Galerie Max Hetzler in Paris, Brown created a series of interconnected works over two years. He explains:
“Nothing was finished, but all the paintings were started, and they were all talking to each other.”
The paintings feature vibrant colors, dynamic contrasts, and intricate glazing techniques that add depth and complexity. For instance, Brown uses Indian yellow—a pigment derived from ox urine—to create unique tones:
“You apply this yellow over the top of a blue, and it turns this very peculiar green.”
One standout piece, The Untitled, is based on an Albrecht Dürer drawing. Brown manipulates the figure to blur gender distinctions, explaining:
“In my mind, it’s both Christ and Mary at the same time.”
The work includes a blank rectangle at the bottom, inviting viewers to title the piece themselves, an interactive gesture that encourages personal interpretation.
Humor, Depth, and the Role of Titles
Brown’s use of humor is central to his work, influenced by the deadpan wit of Marcel Duchamp. Titles like Dirty Little Seahorses and When the Satellite Sings are meant to provoke both laughter and deeper reflection. He describes the importance of titles:
“The title of a work is like adding an invisible color to the painting.”
Through this playful yet intellectual approach, Brown invites viewers to engage with his art on multiple levels, finding meaning and amusement in equal measure.
Glenn Brown’s Artistic Vision
With In the Altogether, Glenn Brown continues to push the boundaries of painting by combining meticulous technique with rich cultural references. His work reimagines the history of art while challenging viewers to question their perceptions. Whether through surreal landscapes or appropriated brushstrokes, Brown’s paintings create a dialogue between the past and present, offering a thought-provoking and playful exploration of humanity and creativity.